Eksplorasi Praktik Komunikasi Edukatif dan Tantangannya pada Lingkungan Belajar Digital: Kajian Kualitatif Berbasis Pengalaman Peserta Didik

Sugito Sugito

doi:10.55438/jqim.v4i2.211

Authors

Sugito Sugito Institut Agama Islam Rokan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55438/jqim.v4i2.211

Keywords:

Komunikasi Edukatif, Pembelajaran Digital, Fenomenologi Interpretatif, Interaksi Guru dan Siswa, Literasi Digital

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi praktik komunikasi edukatif dan tantangan yang dihadapi peserta didik dalam lingkungan belajar digital. Fenomena yang dikaji berfokus pada dinamika interaksi guru–siswa di ruang daring dan hybrid. Pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologi interpretatif (IPA) digunakan untuk menggali makna subjektif pengalaman komunikasi. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam semi-terstruktur, observasi nonpartisipan, serta dokumentasi (rekaman pembelajaran, catatan LMS, percakapan grup). Partisipan penelitian terdiri dari 12 siswa SMA, SMK, dan mahasiswa di Kabupaten Rokan Hilir yang aktif mengikuti pembelajaran digital. Analisis tematik menghasilkan tiga tema utama: (1) komunikasi terarah dan terstruktur, (2) keterputusan interaksi dan hambatan emosional, serta (3) upaya adaptif siswa dalam memaknai pembelajaran digital. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas komunikasi bergantung pada kejelasan pesan, empati guru, dan strategi adaptasi siswa. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan teori komunikasi pendidikan, memberikan implikasi praktis bagi kebijakan pembelajaran digital, serta membuka ruang bagi studi komparatif guru–siswa di masa depan.

References

Alase, A. (2021). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 29–37.

Amrang, A., Isma, A., & Rusdiah, R. (2025). Exploring student experiences in e-learning for English literacy: Voices from an Indonesian higher education context. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistics. https://jurnal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/jetal/article/view/1795

Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2021). Students’ perceptions toward online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6533–6548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10544-9

Balqis, P., & Hasanah, R. (2024). Communication Accommodation Analysis of Mobile Legend Online Game Player Group at Telu Esports. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i8.1302

Barnlund, D. C. (2008). A transactional model of communication. In 2 (Ed.), Communication theory. Routledge.

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Eatough, V., & Smith, J. A. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and the psychology of health and illness. Health Psychology Review, 16(2), 110–127.

Han, L., Guo, X., & Xu, Z. (2023). Exploring transactional communication and engagement in online higher education. Computers & Education, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104683

Hidayati, I., Rahman, A., Deri, P. S., & Susanti, M. (2025). What works and what challenges in blended learning: A qualitative case study of university lecturers’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Practice. https://ukinstitute.org/journals/jopp/article/view/1255

Johnson, M., & Skaržauskienė, A. (2022). The human dimension of digital communication in education: Toward empathic learning design. Educational Media International, 59(2), 87–102.

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29.

Kim, J., & Thayne, J. (2021). Effects of instructor presence on students’ affective learning in online classes. Computers & Education, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104261

Kumi-Yeboah, A., Dogbey, J., Zhang, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Culturally responsive communication in digital classrooms: A qualitative study. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 45–61.

Lowenthal, P. R., Borup, J., West, R. E., & Archambault, L. (2022). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection in online learning. Educational Media International, 59(1), 1–13.

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2022). Digital platforms for learning: Understanding the human dimension of communication. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 357–373.

Nugroho, A. (2021). Digital pedagogy and communication patterns in Indonesian online learning. Indonesian Journal of Education, 13(2), 145–158.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544.

Prastyanti, S., Sulaiman, A. I., & Adi, T. N. (2025). Student innovation adoption in digital media literacy-based educational communication. International Journal of Media and Education. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/student-innovation-adoption-in-digital-media-literacy-based-educational-communication

Rahmawati, I., & Nugroho, D. (2023). The challenges of teacher–student communication in hybrid learning: An Indonesian perspective. Asian Education Studies, 10(1), 22–34.

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.

Supriyanto, E., & al., et. (2022). Pedagogical innovation and student engagement in online education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12301–12319.

Tamamah, J. (2025). Integrasi ICT dalam dinamika interaksi pendidikan: Studi literatur pada hubungan guru dan siswa. Jurnal Hibrul Ulama. https://doi.org/10.47662/hibrululama.v7i1.996

Venus, A., Waluyo, L. S., & Ayuningtyas, F. (2025). Lecturers’ experiences of online learning communication in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. F1000Research, 13(170). https://f1000research.com/articles/13-170

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wulandari, A., Mulyana, D., Hadisiwi, P., & Rizal, E. (2025). Digital learning communication to preserving Javanese: The role of digital media in education of local language in high schools. The Communication Process: International Journal. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1483471

Zawacki-Richter, O., & al., et. (2020). Systematic review of research on digital learning (2000–2019): Frameworks and gaps. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 1–20.

Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2024). Teacher-student communication patterns and learning engagement in online contexts: A cross-cultural analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1157–1173.

Zhao, L., Chen, Q., & Liu, S. (2022). Social interaction and meaning-making in digital learning environments: A phenomenological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 135, 107356.